How the UK Highways Agency Ensures Compliance with Asbestos Regulations

RoadvisionAI enhances AI road safety audit and strengthens road safety compliance monitoring system frameworks across complex highway infrastructure networks.

Asbestos may feel like a relic of the past, yet its legacy remains embedded in many older assets across the United Kingdom’s strategic road network. Before its ban in 1999, asbestos was widely used for insulation, structural strength, and fire resistance. Today, it represents a significant occupational and environmental hazard when disturbed during maintenance or refurbishment.

The former Highways Agency now operating as National Highways carries the responsibility of managing asbestos risks across thousands of kilometres of road and associated structures. Guided by the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 and its General Asbestos Management Plan (GAMP), the agency has established a structured compliance system built on policy, process, and technology.

“Better safe than sorry” is more than a phrase here; it is the foundation of national infrastructure governance.

Uk Roads Images – Browse 149,146 Stock Photos, Vectors, and Video | Adobe  Stock
UK Highways

1. Why Compliance with Asbestos Regulations Is Critical

Under Regulation 4 (Duty to Manage) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006, asset owners must:

  • Identify asbestos-containing materials (ACMs)
  • Assess exposure risk
  • Implement control or removal strategies
  • Maintain accurate records
  • Inform and train workers

National Highways must ensure not only internal compliance but also that contractors, maintenance providers, and technology partners meet the same standards.

This structured governance aligns closely with modern AI roadway safety management systems that integrate hazard awareness into broader infrastructure monitoring.

2. Core Principles of the General Asbestos Management Plan (GAMP)

GAMP serves as the national blueprint for asbestos management across:

  • 7,500 km of strategic roads
  • 16,000+ bridges and structures
  • 100,000+ technology and communications assets
  • Tunnels, depots, control centres, and ancillary facilities

2.1. Systematic Identification of ACMs

Structured inspections ensure no asset category is overlooked. Digital coordination supports smart road safety monitoring by linking asset condition and compliance records.

2.2. Asbestos Action Plans (AAPs)

AAPs are prepared for every 5 km highway section and major facility. These living documents track identified ACMs, risk assessments, and mitigation actions.

Integration with digital safety audit platform workflows ensures transparency and traceability.

2.3. National Database Integration

All asbestos data must be uploaded into central systems such as:

  • SMIS (Structures Management Information System)
  • HAPMS (Highway Asset Pavement Management System)
  • TPMS (Technology Performance Management System)

Centralisation supports continuous AI highway safety assessment across infrastructure categories.

2.4. Long-Term Compliance Strategy

National Highways established a 20-year roadmap targeting full compliance by March 2025. This phased model ensures manageable annual progress while maintaining safety standards.

2.5. Competency and Training

Under Regulation 10 of CAR 2006, all relevant personnel must receive appropriate asbestos awareness training. Technology enhances oversight, but qualified human expertise remains essential.

3. Delivering Compliance in Practice and Where RoadVision AI Supports

3.1. Structured Annual Coverage

Each service provider surveys at least 5% of its network annually, maintaining a steady pipeline of updated AAP documentation. This disciplined cadence mirrors AI road safety audit cycles used for pavement and roadside risk assessments.

3.2. Risk-Based Prioritisation

Pre-1999 assets receive priority attention, ensuring higher-risk structures are surveyed first. Predictive modelling principles used in AI roadway safety management similarly help prioritise deteriorating pavement assets before intrusive works are required.

4. Precise Identification of Risk Locations

ACMs may exist in:

Structures:

  • Bridge joint fillers
  • Culvert coatings
  • Bearings and mastics

Road Systems:

  • Cabling ducts
  • Lighting column insulation
  • Electrical cabinets

Buildings & Tunnels:

  • Lagging and pipe insulation
  • Fuse boards and panels
  • Rope gaskets and duct insulation

Digital inspection ecosystems combined with AI road safety inspection processes reduce the likelihood of accidental disturbance during maintenance.

5. Scheme Asbestos Management Plans (SAMPs)

Major capital schemes require SAMPs from design to completion. This integrated lifecycle approach aligns with structured road safety compliance monitoring system methodologies.

6. The Supporting Role of RoadVision AI

While RoadVision AI does not detect asbestos fibres, it strengthens compliance indirectly by enabling:

  • Early detection of pavement deterioration
  • Smarter scheduling of intrusive works
  • Data-driven maintenance forecasting
  • Reduced emergency interventions
  • Better coordination between condition monitoring and hazard assessments

Through advanced analytics and AI highway safety assessment modelling, engineers gain clearer visibility into asset conditions helping avoid situations where urgent reactive works intersect with undocumented legacy hazards.

7. Challenges on the Road to Full Compliance

Despite a robust framework, challenges persist:

  • Incomplete legacy documentation
  • Mixed ownership boundaries outside core SRN control
  • Workforce competency variations
  • High asset volumes requiring coordination
  • Interoperability gaps between digital systems

Continuous smart road safety monitoring tools help bridge these gaps through consistent, centralised visibility.

8. Final Thoughts

The transition from the Highways Agency to National Highways reflects an evolution in infrastructure governance one grounded in accountability, transparency, and data-driven oversight.

Through GAMP, structured AAP coverage, national databases, and strict adherence to the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006, the UK has established a model for managing legacy hazards within critical infrastructure.

As the March 2025 compliance milestone approaches, the strategy demonstrates that disciplined planning and technological support can overcome even deeply embedded risks.

Platforms like roadvision ai contribute by enabling:

  • Early defect identification
  • Predictive maintenance planning
  • Integrated infrastructure analytics
  • Smarter intervention scheduling
  • Continuous compliance visibility

In modern infrastructure management, technology is not merely a convenience it is the compass guiding safer, smarter, and more sustainable roads for the future.