Contact Us
RoadVision AI Private Limited
2nd Floor, C-9, Above PNB Bank,
SDA Market Community Centre,
Opposite IIT Delhi Main Gate
New Delhi, India – 110016
© 2024 | RoadVision AI | All rights reserved
When designing road infrastructure, the choice between roundabouts and signalised intersections significantly impacts road safety and efficiency. While both designs have merits, their effectiveness depends on traffic conditions, user needs, and environmental constraints. The Guide to Road Design Part 1: Objectives of Road Design (AGRD01-21) provides comprehensive insights into designing safer roads, emphasizing intersections' role in road safety. Among the types of intersections discussed, roundabouts and signalised intersections are prominent for their distinct safety benefits and challenges.
Roundabouts have fewer conflict points compared to signalised intersections. This streamlined design minimizes opportunities for high-severity collisions, such as right-angle (T-bone) crashes.
The circular layout of roundabouts naturally slows down vehicles, reducing both crash likelihood and severity. Slower speeds allow drivers more time to react to potential hazards.
Roundabouts facilitate a continuous flow of traffic, reducing vehicle idling and congestion. This leads to shorter travel times and improved fuel efficiency, enhancing overall traffic management.
Splitter islands in roundabouts allow pedestrians to cross one direction of traffic at a time, improving safety compared to signalised intersections where pedestrians must navigate multiple lanes simultaneously.
Signalised intersections can handle high traffic volumes and complex movements more efficiently than roundabouts, making them suitable for dense urban environments.
Traffic signals provide clear, timed instructions for pedestrian crossings, offering a structured environment for safe passage in areas with heavy foot traffic.
In sprawling urban areas, signalised intersections can be synchronized across multiple blocks, creating coordinated traffic flows and reducing stop-and-go movement.
Signalised intersections require less physical space compared to roundabouts, making them more feasible in densely populated or constrained areas.
The Safe System approach emphasizes designing roads to accommodate human error while minimizing crash severity. Both intersection types align with these principles under specific conditions:
Roundabouts excel in managing moderate traffic flows, whereas signalised intersections are more effective for high-density traffic conditions.
In areas with significant pedestrian or cyclist presence, signalised intersections may offer better safety through controlled crossings.
Roundabouts require larger footprints, making them less suitable for urban environments with limited space.
Signalised intersections incur ongoing costs for electricity and maintenance, while roundabouts typically have lower long-term expenses.
The decision between roundabouts and signalised intersections depends on the specific needs of a road network. Roundabouts excel in safety and efficiency for moderate traffic, while signalised intersections are ideal for managing high volumes and diverse road user types. By applying the Safe System approach and considering contextual factors, road designers can optimize intersection designs to enhance safety and functionality for all users.