Contact Us
RoadVision AI Private Limited
2nd Floor, C-9, Above PNB Bank,
SDA Market Community Centre,
Opposite IIT Delhi Main Gate
New Delhi, India – 110016
© 2024 | RoadVision AI | All rights reserved
When planning bypasses around towns, avoiding uncontrolled development along these new roads—known as ribbon development—is a critical concern. The IRC Code 102-1988, issued by the Indian Roads Congress, provides in-depth guidelines on traffic studies for planning bypasses, emphasizing the vital need for legislative measures to prevent such development.
In this blog, we delve into IRC Code 102, its relevance today, and how legislation can be a powerful tool to preserve the functional integrity of bypass roads.
IRC:102-1988, titled “Traffic Studies for Planning Bypasses Around Towns”, is a technical guideline developed to help engineers and planners determine when and where a bypass is needed around an urban area. It outlines the methodologies for conducting origin-destination (O-D) surveys, traffic volume counts, speed and delay studies, and economic analyses to justify the construction of bypasses.
A significant focus of the code is to ensure that bypasses, once constructed, continue to serve their primary purpose: diverting through traffic away from congested urban areas.
One of the most persistent challenges associated with bypass roads is ribbon development—the linear spread of commercial or residential activity along the new road. Over time, such development:
“A bypass, after being constructed, soon becomes engulfed with local activities resulting in a total loss of its desired functional character… Tendencies of ribbon development must also be totally curbed through proper legislation on land control and effective implementation.” – IRC:102-1988, Section 1.5
According to IRC Code 102, legislation is a preemptive tool. Its objective is to regulate and restrict land-use changes that could lead to ribbon development. Without strong legal frameworks, even the most well-planned bypasses can become ineffective within a few years.
IRC Code 102 underscores the importance of synchronizing bypass alignment with the existing and future land use plans of the town. It’s not just about diverting traffic but integrating the bypass seamlessly with long-term urban development goals.
“Planning the bypass alignment in relation to the master plan of the town in such a manner that the bypass remains unaffected by local urban activities till the end of the design year…” – IRC:102-1988, Section 1.5
Though IRC 102 provides a hypothetical case study, real-world examples across India show how bypasses without land-use regulations quickly attract shops, hotels, warehouses, and unauthorized constructions—leading to:
Strong policy is ineffective without enforcement. IRC 102 calls for:
IRC Code 102 is more than a guideline—it's a strategic roadmap for sustainable bypass planning. By embedding land control legislation into infrastructure policy, India can safeguard the utility of its bypass roads and prevent the socio-economic costs of ribbon development.
By understanding the technical, economic, and legislative aspects provided in IRC 102, urban planners and engineers can ensure that bypasses remain efficient conduits for decades—serving not just vehicles but the long-term vision of well-planned towns.
RoadVision AI is revolutionizing the way we build and maintain infrastructure by leveraging the power of AI in roads to enhance road safety and optimize road management. By utilizing cutting-edge roads AI technology, the platform enables the early detection of potholes, cracks, and other road surface issues, ensuring timely maintenance and improved road conditions. With a mission to create smarter, safer, and more sustainable roads, RoadVision AI ensures full compliance with IRC Codes, empowering engineers and stakeholders to make data-driven decisions that reduce costs, minimize risks, and improve the overall transportation experience.